Friday, 13 January 2012

IBM scientists create smallest magnetic memory bit with 12 atoms




In IBM’s Almaden Research Center  in San Jose, California Andreas Heinrich gets to explore. His quest: Demonstrate that very few atoms are needed to store information. Why would anyone care? Because size matters.

Today, to store a single bit — the most basic piece of information a computer understands –  a disk drive needs one million atoms. Heinrich and his team have successfully shown that data can be stored in as few as 12 magnetic atoms.  That’s 12 versus 1 million and it means a hundred times more information can be stored in the same space.


Researchers have successfully stored a single data bit in only 12 atoms. The researchers from IBM say. They believe this is the world's smallest magnetic memory bit.


According to the researchers, the technique opens up the possibility of producing much denser forms of magnetic computer memory than today's hard disk drives and solid state memory chips.

"Roughly every two years hard drives become denser," research lead author Sebastian Loth said. The obvious question to ask is how long can we keep going. And the fundamental physical limit is the world of atoms.

"The approach that we used is to jump to the very end, check if we can store information in one atom, and if not one atom, how many do we need?" he said.


Below 12 atoms the researchers found that the bits randomly lost information, owing to quantum effects.

A bit can have a value of 0 or 1 and is the most basic form of information in computation. "We kept building larger structures until we emerged out of the quantum mechanical into the classical data storage regime and we reached this limit at 12 atoms."


The groups of atoms, which were kept at a very low temperatures, were arranged using a scanning tunnelling microscope. Researchers were subsequently able to form a byte made of eight of the 12-atom bits.

Central to the research has been the use of materials with different magnetic properties.


The magnetic fields of bits made from conventional ferromagnetic materials can affect neighbouring bits if they are packed too closely together.

"In conventional magnetic data storage the information is stored in ferromagnetic material," said Dr Loth, who is now based at the Center for Free-Electron Laser Science in Germany.


"That adds up to a big magnetic field that can interfere with neighbours. That's a big problem for further miniaturisation." Other scientists thought that was an interesting result.

"Current magnetic memory architectures are fundamentally limited in how small they can go," Dr Will Branford, of Imperial College London said.


"This work shows that in principle data can be stored much more densely using antiferromagnetic bits." But the move from the lab to the production may be some time away.

"Even though I as a scientist would totally dig having a scanning tunnelling microscope in every household, I agree it's a very experimental tool."


Dr Loth believes that by increasing the number of atoms to between 150 to 200 the bits can be made stable at room temperature. That opens up the possibility of more practical applications.

"This is now a technological challenge to find out about new manufacturing techniques," he said.



Heinrich, a German who received his Ph.D. from University of Goettingen, showed that this can be done at low temperature and by that we’re talking about 10 Kelvin which translates into about -260 degrees Celsius. 
“I think 150 atoms should be stable at room temperature,” Heinrich said.


For the world outside the lab manipulating matter by its most basic component – the atom — can mean a way to build, faster, smaller and most of all more energy-efficient devices but that’s not easily replicated on a commercial scale.



“It took a room full of equipment worth about 1 million dollars and a whole lot of sweat,” Heinrich said of his research.



“The atoms are in a very regular pattern because we put them there,” Heinrich said. “Nobody knows how to make that cost effective in manufacturing…that’s the core issue of nanotechnology.”

No comments:

Post a Comment